How is PaperBridge different from an AI paper summarizer?
A typical summarizer compresses the abstract and conclusion. PaperBridge also explains mechanisms, evidence quality, ablations, limitations, and practical meaning with original diagrams.
Understand the method, evidence, and limits—not just the abstract
Enterprise document extraction is not just about getting the right value once. It also has to find every record, point back to the source, and stay affordable when documents get long and messy.

This paper studies how to improve a frozen agent by editing a separate skill document instead of changing model weights. The core idea is plain: keep the agent fixed, let another model propose bounded text edits to the skill, and accept an edit only when it improves held-out validation score.

Jun Yamada, Adithyavairavan Murali, Ajay Mandlekar, Clemens Eppner, Ingmar Posner, and Balakumar Sundaralingam · ICRA 2026 · arXiv:2509.06201

Wenli Xiao et al. · ICLR 2026 conference paper · Primary paper

Shenyuan Gao et al. · ICML 2026 Spotlight · arXiv:2602.06949

Ruijie Zheng et al. · Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL) 2025 · Paper · Proceedings

Joel Jang et al. · Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL) 2025 · Paper · Proceedings

NVIDIA technical report on arXiv (arXiv:2503.14734, version 2, 27 March 2025). This is not presented as a peer-reviewed conference paper.

Tairan He et al. · arXiv:2502.01143v3 · 2025 · Primary source

Tairan He et al. · arXiv:2410.21229v2 · ICRA 2025 · Primary paper

Tairan He, Zhengyi Luo, Xialin He, Wenli Xiao, Chong Zhang, Weinan Zhang, Kris Kitani, Changliu Liu, and Guanya Shi · arXiv:2406.08858 · submitted 13 June 2024 · paper

This paper argues that video generators can be pushed beyond short clips into an interactive world simulator: one that keeps track of what happened earlier, reacts to user actions, and still moves fast enough to feel live.

Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Geoffrey E. Hinton · NeurIPS 2012

Paper: Alexander Kirillov et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2304.02643 · Full paper

Authors: Haotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, and Yong Jae Lee Published: NeurIPS 2023 (Oral); arXiv v2, 11 December 2023 Primary source: Paper abstract · Full paper (PDF) Reading note: Results and limitations

Authors: Shunyu Yao, Jeffrey Zhao, Dian Yu, Nan Du, Izhak Shafran, Karthik Narasimhan, and Yuan Cao Published: ICLR 2023 · arXiv v3, 10 March 2023 Primary source: arXiv:2210.03629 · PDF Reading note: Results belo

Jordan Hoffmann and colleagues · arXiv:2203.15556 · submitted 29 March 2022

Long Ouyang et al. · OpenAI · submitted 4 March 2022 · arXiv:2203.02155 · PDF

Paper: Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma, Brian Ichter, Fei Xia, Ed H. Chi, Quoc V. Le, and Denny Zhou · arXiv:2201.11903 · submitted 28 January 2022, revised 10 January 2023 · primary source · [full text](https://ar5iv.labs.arxiv.org/ht

Robin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser, and Björn Ommer · CVPR 2022 · arXiv:2112.10752 · version 2, 13 April 2022

Authors: Edward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu, Yuanzhi Li, Shean Wang, Lu Wang, and Weizhu Chen Source: arXiv:2106.09685, version 2 (16 October 2021) · PDF Reading note: “Low rank” here describ

Alec Radford et al. · OpenAI · arXiv:2103.00020 · submitted 26 February 2021 Primary source: arXiv record · paper PDF

Authors: Alexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn, Xiaohua Zhai, Thomas Unterthiner, Mostafa Dehghani, Matthias Minderer, Georg Heigold, Sylvain Gelly, Jakob Uszkoreit, and Neil Houlsby Published: ICLR 2021; arXiv version 2, 3 June 2021 Primary source: [arX

Jonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, Pieter Abbeel · NeurIPS 2020 · Paper · PDF

Patrick Lewis et al. · NeurIPS 2020 · arXiv:2005.11401 · version 4, 12 April 2021

Tom B. Brown et al. · OpenAI · 2020 · arXiv:2005.14165

Jared Kaplan and colleagues, 2020 · arXiv:2001.08361

Authors: Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova Source: arXiv:1810.04805, version 2 · submitted 11 October 2018, revised 24 May 2019 Reading note: This explanation separates the authors’ reported findings from practical interp

Authors: Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N. Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin Published: arXiv:1706.03762, first submitted 12 June 2017; source version v7 dated 2 August 2023 Primary source: [arXiv abstract](https://arxiv.org/abs/17

Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun · 2015

Diederik P. Kingma and Max Welling · arXiv:1312.6114 · submitted 20 December 2013, revised version available on arXiv Primary source: arXiv abstract · paper PDF

Ian J. Goodfellow, Jean Pouget-Abadie, Mehdi Mirza, Bing Xu, David Warde-Farley, Sherjil Ozair, Aaron Courville, and Yoshua Bengio · 2014 · Primary source · PDF

FAQ
A typical summarizer compresses the abstract and conclusion. PaperBridge also explains mechanisms, evidence quality, ablations, limitations, and practical meaning with original diagrams.
You can look up arXiv abstract pages, public paper pages, and direct PDF links. Existing reports open immediately; signed-in users can generate a missing language version.
The public library currently focuses on Chinese, English, and Japanese reports. The generation workflow also supports Spanish.